A greenhouse and a chicken farm are both located in a watershed. Which statement compares how both industries can harm water sources in the watershed?(1 point)

Responses

The wastes from the greenhouse are safer to add to the water than those from the farm.
The wastes from the greenhouse are safer to add to the water than those from the farm.

The farm needs water for growing grain for the chickens, and the greenhouse also needs water to raise plants.
The farm needs water for growing grain for the chickens, and the greenhouse also needs water to raise plants.

The greenhouse uses the water to water plants, and the chickens drink the water from the watershed.
The greenhouse uses the water to water plants, and the chickens drink the water from the watershed.

Both the greenhouse and the farm get rid of wastes by dumping them in the water in the watershed.

3 answers

The statement that best compares how both industries can harm water sources in the watershed is:

Both the greenhouse and the farm get rid of wastes by dumping them in the water in the watershed.

This statement highlights the potential for both industries to negatively impact water quality through waste disposal, which can lead to pollution in the watershed.

Are you sure?

Yes, I am sure. The statement "Both the greenhouse and the farm get rid of wastes by dumping them in the water in the watershed" accurately reflects how both industries can contribute to water pollution.

Both greenhouses and chicken farms can generate waste that may enter water sources and potentially harm water quality. This comparison highlights a significant environmental concern regarding waste management practices in both industries.

If you have a specific context or need further clarification, feel free to share!