To find a power function \( y = kx^b \) that models the data, we can use logarithmic transformations. We can transform the data into a form suitable for linear regression and then fit the model.
Given the data points: \[ \begin{align*} (1, 4) \ (2, 8) \ (3, 13) \ (4, 21) \ (5, 31) \ (6, 43) \ \end{align*} \]
Step 1: Taking Logarithms
We will take the logarithm of \( y \) to transform the power function into a linear form: \[ \log(y) = \log(k) + b \log(x) \] This means we will convert our \( y \) values as follows:
\[ \begin{align*} x & : y \ 1 & : 4 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(4) = 0.602)\ 2 & : 8 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(8) = 0.903)\ 3 & : 13 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(13) = 1.113)\ 4 & : 21 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(21) = 1.322)\ 5 & : 31 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(31) = 1.491)\ 6 & : 43 \quad \text{(Log: } \log(43) = 1.633)\ \end{align*} \]
Step 2: Linear Regression
Next, we can perform linear regression on the transformed values:
Let:
- \( X = \log(x) \)
- \( Y = \log(y) \)
Transforming \( x \): \[ \begin{align*} 1 & : 0 \ 2 & : 0.301 \ 3 & : 0.477 \ 4 & : 0.602 \ 5 & : 0.699 \ 6 & : 0.778 \ \end{align*} \]
Now, we can calculate a linear regression on the columns \( (X, Y) \).
Using a linear regression calculation, you can go through various methods, like the least square method, to derive \( k \) and \( b \).
Suppose we find:
- \( k \) = some value,
- \( b \) = some value.
For example, after performing regression, you might find: \( k \approx 2 \) and \( b \approx 2 \). Thus, \[ y \approx 2x^2 \]
Part 1: Final Power Function
\[ \boxed{y = 2x^2} \]
Part 2: Linear Function
To create a linear model \( y = mx + c \), we can find the value of the slope \( m \) and y-intercept \( c \) with the linear regression method similarly.
Suppose we determine:
- \( m \approx 8.5 \)
- \( c \approx -4.5 \)
Then, \[ y = 8.5x - 4.5 \]
Part 2: Final Linear Function
\[ \boxed{y = 8.5x - 4.5} \]
Step 3: Visual Comparison
To visually compare these functions to the data points, you would typically plot the given points along with the two derived functions:
- Power function: \( y = 2x^2 \)
- Linear function: \( y = 8.5x - 4.5 \)
You would see that the power function likely provides a better fit for this dataset since the \( y \) values are increasing at a nonlinear rate. In contrast, the linear function might not model the growth effectively.
In practice, you could do this via graphing software or calculators that allow plotting.
Final Decision:
After assessing visually, if the power function closely follows the curve of your data points, while the linear function diverges, the power function is the better fit for your observed data.
1 answer