To determine the correct response, we need to focus on the variables represented in your scenario. The variable \( t \) represents time in minutes, and the variable \( W \) represents the amount of water in gallons.
- The unit for the variable \( W \) (amount of water in the pond) is gallons.
- The unit for the variable \( t \) (time spent filling the pond) is minutes.
Given the context, a reasonable scale for each variable would depend on the total volume of the pond and the rate at which water is being added.
Assuming a typical pond could hold a relatively large amount of water (let's say 10,000 gallons), and you might be adding water at a practical rate (for example, 10 gallons per minute), calculations will carry over from the variables of gallons into minutes, leading us to a reasonable scale.
Thus the responses can be weighed as follows:
-
The unit used for the amount of water is gallons. A reasonable incremental scale of gallons could be increments of 1,000, spanning from 0 to 10,000, which provides a clear view of water volume in a reasonably large pond.
-
For the time variable (minutes), a more granular approach, like increments of 10 minutes, ranging from 0 to 180 minutes, may be appropriate depending on the full operational timeframe to fill the pond.
Based on those analyses, the most appropriate selected response is:
The unit used is gallons, and a reasonable scale would be increments of 1,000, from 0 to 10,000.
This scale for gallons aligns with how water volumes would typically be quantified in a project that aims to fill a pond effectively.