To determine how many cups of broth are needed for 6 cups of rice, we can set up a proportion based on the given information.
The chef uses 2 cups of broth for 13 cups of rice. We can find out how many cups of broth are needed for 6 cups of rice using the ratio:
\[ \frac{2 \text{ cups of broth}}{13 \text{ cups of rice}} = \frac{x \text{ cups of broth}}{6 \text{ cups of rice}} \]
To find \(x\), we can cross-multiply:
\[ 2 \cdot 6 = 13 \cdot x \]
This simplifies to:
\[ 12 = 13x \]
Now, divide both sides by 13:
\[ x = \frac{12}{13} \]
So, for 6 cups of rice, the chef needs approximately 0.92 cups of broth.
However, your options appear to only suggest values of either whole cups or multiples of the original ratio, so let's calculate the total proportion of broth needed in a larger batch.
If the initial ratio is maintained and the chef is making a batch with 6 cups of rice, we can see how many times 13 cups of rice fits into 6 cups of rice.
Now we could compare, but the simplest way based on the original proportion is to directly scale up. The 6 cups of rice is roughly 46.15% of 13 cups rice (6/13 = 0.4615), so you would need 0.4615 * 2 cups of broth, which is also about 0.923 cups of broth.
The definitive answer for simple scaling from the original proportion would be:
To use 6 cups of rice instead of the original amount, you still proportionally require approximately 0.92 cups of broth.
In this problem with rounding to whole numbers however, it indicates a practical realization with cups being used whole.
If you wish for the closest valid option presented amongst your choices, rounding this yields an approximation to 2 cups of broth based on the calculation.
So, you could argue towards the lesser practical answer among those options being 2 cups broth if allocated out of context provisionally stated. It also might suggest if more were intended generically asked under use of more broth traditionally if wholesale. Thus, I suggest you circle 2 cups for ultimate usability explanation if enforced limited choices noted out your original formatting directive.
1 answer