Here are the most reasonable conclusions for each question based on the information provided:
Question 1: More data should be collected to get a more reliable average.
Rationale: The additional trial provides a new data point that is different from the average of the first three trials. Collecting more data will help to better establish a reliable average.
Question 2: A boiling point at 1.5 atmospheres could be predicted fairly well.
Rationale: Since the tests show a nearly constant increase in boiling point with each increase in pressure, it suggests a predictable relationship. Thus, extrapolating to slightly above the maximum tested pressure of 1.4 atmospheres is reasonable.
Question 3: Checking the calibration of the thermometer to ensure that it is giving accurate readings.
Rationale: Since the results are consistently 5 degrees below the expected values, it is essential to investigate the accuracy of the measuring instrument (the thermometer) before concluding anything about the boiling point itself.
Question 4: The actual boiling point is probably between 34°C and 40°C.
Rationale: The report of the boiling point as 37° ± 3°C indicates that the results suggest a range of possible values that the actual boiling point could fall within.
Question 5: By taking 10 measurements of each of the five liquids and finding an average.
Rationale: This method ensures that the team has a representative data set for each substance, allowing for better analysis of the relationship between molecular weight and boiling point. Averaging multiple measurements will help to minimize random error and improve reliability.