Ask a New Question

Asked by Anonymous

No gross pus or purulent discharge was or were noted at the old incision site.

Should this be was or were? I think it should be was.
11 years ago

Answers

Answered by Ms. Sue
Right.
11 years ago
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

6) A nurse is evaluating discharge instructions for a client following a right cataract extraction.... gross profit gross margin is equal to Your gross pay is $2,759.00. Your involuntary deductions are FICA (7.65%), federal withholding (12%)... Ray's gross pay is $320.09 a week. &46 is witheld for federal income tax, $24.04 for FICAtax, and $1... Gross Why do economists use gross domestic product to measure economic success? Holly’s gross pay after two weeks of work is $1,475. Her income after taxes is $1,321.60. To the nea... For 2023, what is the gross income test for a taxpayer claiming a qualifying relative? The potent... Zoe's gross income is $16,960. His medical expenses for the year amounted to $812.35. If he ca... Analyze the following gross national income (GNI) numbers and the country populations to select the...
Submit Your Answer

Question

No gross pus or purulent discharge was or were noted at the old incision site.

Should this be was or were? I think it should be was.

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use