Ask a New Question

Question

1. He must have been rich.
2. I am sure he was rich.
3. I am sure that he was rich.
4. It is certain he was rich.
5. It is certain that he was rich.
6. Certainly he was rich.
7. Surely he was rich.

(Are they all the same? Do we have to use 'that' or not?)
11 years ago

Answers

Writeacher
You can keep "that" or omit it ... either way works fine.

All mean approximately the same thing, yes.
11 years ago

Related Questions

why is the gap between the rich and the poor growing according to Robert Reich in "What happned to t... 1. He may not be rich. 2. He can not be rich. (Are both the same or different? If they are diffe... hi Does anyone know about Richard Carl Emil Erlenmeyer's friends, his problems, addictions and char... 1. However rich you may be, you can't buy it. 2. However rich you are, you can't buy it. 3.... 1. It seems that he is rich. (Is the that clause a subjective complement?) 2. My car is simila... 1. She must have been rich. 2. She cannot have been rich. 3. You should/ought to have come earlier... 1. She became very rich and famous. 2. She became very rich and very famous. 3. She became very ri... How to be a rich guy how to get rich
Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use