Asked by Jacob
Find the absolute extrema of the function on the interval [2,3]. (Round your answers to the nearest hundredth.)
Absolute Minimum ___ at x=___
Absolute Maximum ___ at x=___
Absolute Minimum ___ at x=___
Absolute Maximum ___ at x=___
Answers
Answered by
Jacob
I am sorry, the function is g(x)= x/(ln(x))
Answered by
Steve
g' = (lnx-1)/ln^2(x)
since any local max/min occur at ln(x) = 1, that is at x=e
So, if that's a local max, then it is the interval max on [2,3].
g'' = (2-lnx)/(x ln^3(x))
g''(e) = 1/e > 0, so the graph is concave up at x=e, making f(e) a minumum.
So, max on [2,3] is the greater of f(2) and f(3).
f(2) = 2.88
f(3) = 2.73
so, the max on the interval [2,3] = 2/ln2
The minimum is f(e) = e = 2.72
since any local max/min occur at ln(x) = 1, that is at x=e
So, if that's a local max, then it is the interval max on [2,3].
g'' = (2-lnx)/(x ln^3(x))
g''(e) = 1/e > 0, so the graph is concave up at x=e, making f(e) a minumum.
So, max on [2,3] is the greater of f(2) and f(3).
f(2) = 2.88
f(3) = 2.73
so, the max on the interval [2,3] = 2/ln2
The minimum is f(e) = e = 2.72
Answered by
Damon
dg/dx = [ ln x (1) - x (1/x) ] / (ln x)^2
= [ln x - 1 ] / (ln x)^2
that is zero when x = e or x = about 2.72
is that a max or a min?
you could take another derivative, but easier to check when x = 2.5 or something
if x = 2.5
dg/dx = [.916 -1 ] / .84 = negative
so as x goes from 2.5 to 2.72 the derivative goes from negative to zero
therefore there is a minimum at x = e
calculate it
now check the value of g at the end points, x = 2 and x = 3 and see which is bigger
= [ln x - 1 ] / (ln x)^2
that is zero when x = e or x = about 2.72
is that a max or a min?
you could take another derivative, but easier to check when x = 2.5 or something
if x = 2.5
dg/dx = [.916 -1 ] / .84 = negative
so as x goes from 2.5 to 2.72 the derivative goes from negative to zero
therefore there is a minimum at x = e
calculate it
now check the value of g at the end points, x = 2 and x = 3 and see which is bigger
Answered by
Jacob
Thanks to both of you, I won't forget how to do this next time! It makes much more sense now, and will be even easier on basic functions versus logarithmic/exponential functions. I think it was the natural log that tripped me a little bit there, but thank you for the explanations!
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.