Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
•Do you think that the Korean War was merely a civil war in which the United States supported one side, or should it be conside...Asked by Jennifer
Do you think that the Korean War was merely a civil war in which the United States supported one side, or should it be considered an international war in which the United States used the United Nations to further its anticommunist policie? Can someone please help me thank you!
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
Read this article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
What do you think?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
What do you think?
Answered by
Camren Richards
Really? you would use wikipedia as a source? It is extremely un-reliable. The Korean War was in fact a Civil War very similar to the US Civil War, the only difference is the reaction time of other nations. During the US Civil war, lots of negotiations were being made with other nations for both the Union and the Confederacy. The problem was how long the negotiations lasted. There were no phones where you could call a guy up and ask for help. With the Korean war, they were able to get allies quite rapidly due to the increased ability of communication. You might think that because other nations got involved it becomes an international war, your wrong. it was still fought over one country. there was no one trying to conquer another country, it was just people standing up for what they thought was right. So by saying it was merely a civil war is a bit of an understatement because it still today is having effects on the world, but it never really became an international war since the real fighting stayed contained in Korea, for the most part, and it was fought for ideals of freedom
Answered by
Ms. Sue
I don't know why you think Wikipedia is unreliable. Several studies have proved its reliability.
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html
http://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2006/11/8296/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html
http://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2006/11/8296/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm
Answered by
Jman
Because even the teachers say its unrealiable.
Anyone can edit and put anything on there.
Anyone can edit and put anything on there.
Answered by
Writeacher
Jman ... are you reading and thinking? Or are you just repeating what others have told you? If the latter, how do you know they're right?
Answered by
Jman
Because if we use wikipedia as a source we will be in trouble. My teachers tell me not to use it.
Answered by
Ms. Sue
That's fine. When I was a student, the teachers told us we couldn't cite any encyclopedia in research papers. They wanted us to dig deeper into our subjects than encyclopedias.
Answered by
bobpursley
Actually, Jman, you cite a very good argument for being Homeschooled: Many teachers are unreliable.
Answered by
Jman
Really?
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.