Ask a New Question

Asked by rfvv

1. The Beatles were not happy at all.
2. The Beatles was not happy at all.

(Which one is grammatical?)
13 years ago

Answers

Answered by Ms. Sue
The first one is grammatical, because the individual members were not happy.
13 years ago
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

I JUST WANT TO WISH ALL A HAPPY NEW YEAR. A NEW YEAR A FRESH NEW START FOR EVERYONE. Jasmine... her... How did the Beatles change music and affect today's music? I have found some information on this,... How many songs have the Beatles written total? Also, do you think a song that the Beatles covered (... I know that the Beatles were the first (or one of the first) to make a music video. What song was th... 1. All were happy. 2. All was clean. 3. All were clean. Q: In #1 all means all people, so #1 is... 1. They were so happy enough even to forget to eat their lunches. (Is this sentence grammatical?... We are "so" happy for you. Happy is the adverb, is "happy" the verb it modifies? 1. The Beatles is the most famous band in the world. 2. The Beatles were not happy at all. =====... Happy Easter Happy spring may your house be warm and your blessings be warmer! I wish yall a very h... Hi Bot! Happy friday and happy spring as well
Submit Your Answer

Question

1. The Beatles were not happy at all.
2. The Beatles was not happy at all.

(Which one is grammatical?)

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use