7 of 147 of 14 Items

Question

Question
Which of these could provide a valid explanation for the population distribution depicted on this map?

(1 point)
Responses

The more densely populated areas have few problems.
The more densely populated areas have few problems.

The more densely populated areas are along the coast.
The more densely populated areas are along the coast.

The less densely populated areas are plagued by monsoons.
The less densely populated areas are plagued by monsoons.

The less densely populated areas are engaged in civil war.
The less densely populated areas are engaged in civil war.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

To determine the most valid explanation for the population distribution depicted on the map, we need to analyze each of the given responses:

1. The more densely populated areas have few problems.

   • This is a vague statement and does not provide a clear reasoning for why population distribution might occur.

2. The more densely populated areas are along the coast.

   • Coastal areas often attract higher populations due to access to trade, resources, and transportation. This is a plausible explanation for population density.

3. The less densely populated areas are plagued by monsoons.

   • While adverse weather can affect population density, monsoons are primarily seasonal and might not alone account for persistent low population density.

4. The less densely populated areas are engaged in civil war.

   • Areas experiencing civil conflict typically see a significant decline in population due to displacement, danger, and instability. This could effectively explain low population density.

Based on these analyses, the most valid explanations for the population distribution on the map would likely be “The more densely populated areas are along the coast” and “The less densely populated areas are engaged in civil war.”

However, if I have to pick one that provides a strong geographical and socio-political explanation, I'd recommend "The more densely populated areas are along the coast." This answer reflects a common pattern in human settlement and is more straightforwardly related to geographical factors than the other options. If you can share more context about the map, I could provide a more tailored recommendation.

Answer 2

8 of 148 of 14 Items

Question
Despite the devastation caused by flooding, large populations of people in East Asia live near rivers and the coast for all of the reasons below EXCEPT:(1 point)
Responses

Trade and transportation
Trade and transportation

High agricultural productivity in these areas.
High agricultural productivity in these areas.

Abundant desert landscapes in inland regions.
Abundant desert landscapes in inland regions.

Availability of freshwater resources.
Availability of freshwater resources.
Skip to navigation

Answer 3

The question asks for the reason that does not explain why large populations in East Asia live near rivers and the coast, despite the risks of flooding.

Let's analyze each option:

1. Trade and transportation: Living near rivers and coasts provides access to trade routes and easier transportation options. This is a significant reason for population density in these areas.

2. High agricultural productivity in these areas: River valleys and coastal regions often have fertile soil and favorable conditions for agriculture, which supports large populations.

3. Abundant desert landscapes in inland regions: This option suggests a negative aspect of inland areas. While it's true that deserts can discourage settlement, the presence of abundant desert landscapes is not a reason for high populations near rivers and coasts. Instead, it highlights why people might avoid those inland areas.

4. Availability of freshwater resources: Proximity to rivers ensures access to freshwater, which is crucial for drinking, sanitation, and agriculture, making it a valid reason for population density.

Based on this analysis, the correct answer is: "Abundant desert landscapes in inland regions." This statement does not provide a valid reason for why people live near rivers and coasts; rather, it explains an additional reason why they might avoid living further inland.