Asked by Is Typing...
7 of 117 of 11 Items
Question 1
Sam starts the summer with $950 in his wallet. He aims to have a minimum of $600 left by the end of the summer. Each week, he spends $35 on recreational activities.
Which inequality should be used to determine the number of weeks (w) Sam can continue spending money?
(1 point)
Responses
950+35w>600
950 plus 35 w is greater than 600
950−35w ≤600
950−35w ≤600
950+35w≥600
950 plus 35 w is greater than or equal to 600
950−35w≥600
950 minus 35 w is greater than or equal to 600
Question 2
(1 point)
Sam can continue spending money for
weeks.
Skip to navigation
page 1 of 1
Formula keypad has been closed. Press Control + Backslash to open it again.Formula keypad has been closed. Press Control + Backslash to open it again.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine the correct inequality for the problem, let's analyze it step by step.
1. Sam starts with $950.
2. He wants to have at least $600 left at the end of summer, which means he can spend up to $950 - $600 = $350.
3. Each week, Sam spends $35 on recreational activities.
We can set up the inequality based on what he can spend:
- The total amount spent after \( w \) weeks will be \( 35w \).
- The amount he has left after spending that money is \( 950 - 35w \).
To find out how long he can spend without going below $600, we want to ensure that:
\[ 950 - 35w \geq 600 \]
This means he can spend until the amount left is greater than or equal to $600.
Thus, the correct inequality is:
**950 − 35w ≥ 600**
Now for Question 2, we can solve this inequality for \( w \):
1. Subtract 950 from both sides:
\[ -35w \geq 600 - 950 \]
\[ -35w \geq -350 \]
2. Divide by -35 (note that the inequality sign flips):
\[ w \leq 10 \]
So, Sam can continue spending money for a maximum of **10 weeks**.
1. Sam starts with $950.
2. He wants to have at least $600 left at the end of summer, which means he can spend up to $950 - $600 = $350.
3. Each week, Sam spends $35 on recreational activities.
We can set up the inequality based on what he can spend:
- The total amount spent after \( w \) weeks will be \( 35w \).
- The amount he has left after spending that money is \( 950 - 35w \).
To find out how long he can spend without going below $600, we want to ensure that:
\[ 950 - 35w \geq 600 \]
This means he can spend until the amount left is greater than or equal to $600.
Thus, the correct inequality is:
**950 − 35w ≥ 600**
Now for Question 2, we can solve this inequality for \( w \):
1. Subtract 950 from both sides:
\[ -35w \geq 600 - 950 \]
\[ -35w \geq -350 \]
2. Divide by -35 (note that the inequality sign flips):
\[ w \leq 10 \]
So, Sam can continue spending money for a maximum of **10 weeks**.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!