Ask a New Question

Asked by Daca

Suppose that through laziness and/or sheer stupidity, Densa Inc. always falls 10 percent short of producing the profit-maximizing output. Would higher product price lead to greater output? Does this result suggest why economists are not overly concerened about wheather the profit-maximizing assumption is exactly correct?
13 years ago

Answers

Related Questions

Hello, i am suppose to look at the artwork, Winged Genie Fertilizing a Date Tree. I have to identify... Suppose that A = D + E and that D/A = 0.80. Solve for D/E. These are the steps I have taken, but... suppose Y=100 is fixed,suppose the consumption function is c(Y-T)=20+M(Y-T), where M is constant be... 3.Suppose C(x) = x^2 -10x+27 represents the costs, in hundreds, to produce x thousand pens. How man... Suppose you want to buy three loaves of bread that cost $1.50 each and a jar of peanut butter that c... Suppose f(x) − f(x+1) = 3x^2 and f(3) = 48, determine the value of f(5)  show all steps so i can... Suppose f(x) − f(x+1) = 3x^2 and f(3) = 48, determine the value of f(5) Tagalog ng laziness suppose U={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} is the universal set, and P={2,4,6,8,10}. what is P? suppose U={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} is the universal set, and P={2,4,6,8,10}. what is P? A.{1,2,3,4,...
Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use