The first statement is a philosophical statement, and few scientists are into philosophy.
The second sentence assumes that unity and simplicity are criteria in science.
I reject your premise, and your conclusion in the second statement.
Any answer here is correct, just make an argument that supports your premise. Do a better job with that than the person who wrote this question.
If you are doing this in physics, I really wonder what you are doing in physics.
Scientists call a theory that unites many ideas in a simple way "beautiful." Are unity and simplicity among the criteria of beauty outside of science? Support your answer
1 answer