Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
If a question must be answered that has significant negative psychological impact on the subject, such as in the Stanford priso...Asked by meshelle
If a question must be answered that has significant negative psychological impact on the subject, such as in the Stanford prison study, is it more ethical to use human or animal subjects?
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
Answered last night:
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1326854705
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1326854705
Answered by
PsyDAG
It depends on whose ethics you are using. The value of the knowledge gained from the study needs to be balanced with the potential harm to the subjects. Animal lovers might disagree with Ms.Sue's response, seeing many studies as animal cruelty.
Also, I doubt if you could get any results from animals that could simulate the responses of humans in Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study.
Also, I doubt if you could get any results from animals that could simulate the responses of humans in Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.