Sure! Here are examples of paradox in the first part of Lord Henry's panegyric on beauty:
1) "And beauty is a form of genius... is higher, indeed, than genius, as it needs no explanation."
- This statement presents beauty as a form of genius, which suggests that beauty possesses a level of intellectual depth that is even greater than traditional forms of genius. This paradox lies in the contradiction between beauty being considered both a form of genius and something that transcends the need for explanation.
2) "It cannot be questioned. It has its divine right of sovereignty. It makes princes of those who have it."
- Here, beauty is portrayed as unquestionable and possessing a divine right of sovereignty, as if it has a supreme authority. The paradox lies in the fact that an inherently subjective concept like beauty cannot typically be considered unquestionable or possess sovereignty. It highlights the conflicting notion of beauty having an authoritative power.
I hope these examples help to illustrate the paradoxes in Lord Henry's panegyric on beauty!