Asked by Suzanne
I have collected ssps data and am having trouble taking the data and putting it into a coherent sentence.
I can't paste the chart but here is what I have.
An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare the length of jail sentence given based on the favorability to an attractive defendant conditions and a unattractive defendant conditions
There was a significant difference in the scores for favorability of a attractive defendant (M=4.28, SD=2.30) and the unattractive defendant (M=3.18, SD= 1.922) conditions; t(277) = 4.346, p =0.00 . These results suggest that the favorability of the attractive defendant is higher…..?
I can't paste the chart but here is what I have.
An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare the length of jail sentence given based on the favorability to an attractive defendant conditions and a unattractive defendant conditions
There was a significant difference in the scores for favorability of a attractive defendant (M=4.28, SD=2.30) and the unattractive defendant (M=3.18, SD= 1.922) conditions; t(277) = 4.346, p =0.00 . These results suggest that the favorability of the attractive defendant is higher…..?
Answers
Answered by
PsyDAG
P ≤ .001
"Favorability" is a more awkward and less precise term than shorter and longer.
Jail sentences are significantly shorter for attractive defendants than unattractive defendants (p ≤ .001).
"Favorability" is a more awkward and less precise term than shorter and longer.
Jail sentences are significantly shorter for attractive defendants than unattractive defendants (p ≤ .001).
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.