Asked by Anonymous
For what reasons are you in favour of using nuclear energy to generate electricity? What reasons would you be against nuclear power?
For the against part--that would be that it's a big step of risk towards human health.
For the favourable part--I guess that its just easier to use, and faster.
Could I please receive help.
For the against part--that would be that it's a big step of risk towards human health.
For the favourable part--I guess that its just easier to use, and faster.
Could I please receive help.
Answers
Answered by
Ms. Sue
All of life involves decisions involving risk versus rewards.
When we cross a street or drive 20 miles away from home, we run a risk. But we all take those risks because they seem small compared with the rewards.
We know that fossil fuels will run out some time. Nuclear power will never be depleted. One solution to minimizing the risks involve more stringent testing of existing nuclear plants -- as Germany and other EU countries are doing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12745899
When we cross a street or drive 20 miles away from home, we run a risk. But we all take those risks because they seem small compared with the rewards.
We know that fossil fuels will run out some time. Nuclear power will never be depleted. One solution to minimizing the risks involve more stringent testing of existing nuclear plants -- as Germany and other EU countries are doing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12745899
Answered by
Anonymous
For what reasons are you in favour of using nuclear energy to generate electricity? What reasons would you be against nuclear power?
For the against part--that would be that it's a big step of risk towards human health. Not safe, and safety should always come first. Big events such as an "earthquake" itself can occur. Country can be destroyed, destruction.
For the favourable part--I guess that its just easier to use, and faster. Does that go with technology and creation of resources? Does it have anything to do with food, clothing?
Is this really it? Is there more to it?
For the against part--that would be that it's a big step of risk towards human health. Not safe, and safety should always come first. Big events such as an "earthquake" itself can occur. Country can be destroyed, destruction.
For the favourable part--I guess that its just easier to use, and faster. Does that go with technology and creation of resources? Does it have anything to do with food, clothing?
Is this really it? Is there more to it?
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.