Asked by Anthony
The contention that the Constitution contains moral language that justifies the vigorous protection of individual rights by the judiciary is a view compatible with
a. judicial activism.
b. judicial restraint.
c. analytical jurisprudence.
d. precedent-based jurisprudence.
e. moral relativism.
is it D?
a. judicial activism.
b. judicial restraint.
c. analytical jurisprudence.
d. precedent-based jurisprudence.
e. moral relativism.
is it D?
Answers
Answered by
Anonymous
i think it is d
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!