Asked by Anthony
The contention that the Constitution contains moral language that justifies the vigorous protection of individual rights by the judiciary is a view compatible with
a. judicial activism.
b. judicial restraint.
c. analytical jurisprudence.
d. precedent-based jurisprudence.
e. moral relativism.
is it D?
a. judicial activism.
b. judicial restraint.
c. analytical jurisprudence.
d. precedent-based jurisprudence.
e. moral relativism.
is it D?
Answers
Answered by
Anonymous
i think it is d
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.