Asked by Laurey
Consider the following relation on R1, the set of real numbers
R1 = {(1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (3,2), (2,3)}
Determine whether or not each relation is flexible, symmetric, anti-symmetric, or transitive.
* Reflexive because the relation contains (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4)
* Symmetric because it contains (1,2) & (2,1) and (3,2) & (2,3)
* Antisymmetric (I'm confused with this one)
* Not Transitive because it contains (2,1) & (2,3) but not (1,3)
Would this be considered correct? I'm not sure about antisymmetric. Thanks for any helpful replies
R1 = {(1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (3,2), (2,3)}
Determine whether or not each relation is flexible, symmetric, anti-symmetric, or transitive.
* Reflexive because the relation contains (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4)
* Symmetric because it contains (1,2) & (2,1) and (3,2) & (2,3)
* Antisymmetric (I'm confused with this one)
* Not Transitive because it contains (2,1) & (2,3) but not (1,3)
Would this be considered correct? I'm not sure about antisymmetric. Thanks for any helpful replies
Answers
Answered by
MathMate
reflexive, OK.
symmetry: OK
antisymmetry:
recall: if a~b ∧ b~a -> a=b
(2,3)∧(3,2) [both true] -> 2=3 ?
not transitive: OK
(3,2) ∧ (2,1) [both true] -> (3,1) [false]
symmetry: OK
antisymmetry:
recall: if a~b ∧ b~a -> a=b
(2,3)∧(3,2) [both true] -> 2=3 ?
not transitive: OK
(3,2) ∧ (2,1) [both true] -> (3,1) [false]
Answered by
Laurey
So, it is not antisymmetric because 2 ≠ 3, but what would have made it true?
Answered by
MathMate
Similar to a≥b!
Consider
R:{(3,2),(2,2),(3,3)}
"Antisymmetric if a~b ∧ b~a -> a=b "
(3,2)[true] ∧ (2,3)[false] -> 2=3 [true]
(because the statement is true whenever the condition is false)
(3,3)[true] ∧ (3,3)[true] -> 3=3 [true]
So R is antisymmetric (but not symmetric because (3,2) -> (2,3) [false]
Consider
R:{(3,2),(2,2),(3,3)}
"Antisymmetric if a~b ∧ b~a -> a=b "
(3,2)[true] ∧ (2,3)[false] -> 2=3 [true]
(because the statement is true whenever the condition is false)
(3,3)[true] ∧ (3,3)[true] -> 3=3 [true]
So R is antisymmetric (but not symmetric because (3,2) -> (2,3) [false]
Answered by
Laurey
OooOOo. . .thank you so much for all your help.
Answered by
Anonymous
You're welcome!
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.