Ask a New Question

Asked by jody

Why is a negative income tax, by itself, unlikely to be successful policy for maintaining the living standards of the poor?
14 years ago

Answers

Answered by Harald
It is likely to maintain the living standards of the poor.
10 years ago
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

is a negative times a negative ALWAYS positive? or can it be negative as well? Consider the following income statement and answer the questions that follow:... if man has to pay income tax at rate of 20% of the excess annual income over rs60000,syamal babu r... The income tax in a certain state is figured at 2% of the first 1,000, 3% of the first next 2,000, 4... You want to have an income of $50,000 per year in retirement, and you think you will be alive for 30... What is income How do you do it?- Income tax, social security, and union dues are deducted from Paul Rawling's... 1) A man with an income of $7500 and allowance of $1800, paid $1824 in tax. What is the rate of taxa... What is the income when saving = 1870 And expenditure =83% of income 3. The mean family income in Arizona is about $64,750 with a standard deviation (for the population)...
Submit Your Answer

Question

Why is a negative income tax, by itself, unlikely to be successful policy for maintaining the living standards of the poor?

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use