I would go with D based on this statement.
The Supreme Court justices have been divided in their opinions in affirmative action cases.
In dealing with affirmative action, the Supreme Court has:
A. been clear in rejecting the concept.
B. been clear in its affirmation of the concept.
C. very rarely given detailed interpretations of it.
D. has a mixed record of support for the concept.
I'm stuck between choices C and D.
4 answers
Okay thanks Heather!
I would go wth D also.
It is not the Court's job to give detailed explanations of laws. The details come in when their constitutionality of the law is considered in relation to specific cases.
It is not the Court's job to give detailed explanations of laws. The details come in when their constitutionality of the law is considered in relation to specific cases.
okay thanks :)