Question

Address counterargument. What would your opponents say? What reason would they have to not want the class added?
Now explain why your reason outweighs the counter argument! (Rebuttal)
(This is the 3rd body paragraph)
Use this"I'm writing because I think we should add a new course called "Coding Basics" to our curriculum. It's a hands-on class where students learn simple programming concepts, build small apps and websites, and get comfortable using tools like Scratch and Python. Having this course would give students real-world skills for future jobs, boost problem-solving and creativity across subjects, and help make our school more tech-ready coding gives students real, useful skills and better chances after graduation — tech jobs keep growing and learning to code even a little bit opens doors. Teaching kids to make a tiny app or website isn't just "fun projects," it's practicing how to break big problems into smaller steps, test ideas, and keep trying when something fails — skills employers really want. Lots of education groups and workforce data back this up: computer science in K–12 is linked to stronger problem-solving and higher engagement, and jobs in software and computing are among the faster-growing occupations, so offering Coding Basics now helps students get a head start. Plus, when students — especially those who haven't had access before — actually build things they care about, you see confidence and curiosity grow fast; that feeling sticks with them across classes and can change how they see school and themselves. adding Coding Basics is a step toward equity and measurable opportunity for our students. research published in education journals and national organizations shows that early, classroom-based computer science instruction improves computational thinking, problem-solving, and engagement—skills that transfer to math, science, and real-world tasks. the technology workforce is growing quickly (software and related computing jobs are among the fastest-growing occupations), so even a foundational coding course gives students clearer pathways to well-paying careers and postsecondary options that many families currently can’t access "to help write the first body paragraph make sure you dont use super proper grammar make sure you dont have the links to sources in the middle of the paragraph and only at the end make sure you dont change the original paragraph and only add a new paragraph

Answer 1

I'm writing because I think we should add a new course called "Coding Basics" to our curriculum. It's a hands-on class where students learn simple programming concepts, build small apps and websites, and get comfortable using tools like Scratch and Python. Having this course would give students real-world skills for future jobs, boost problem-solving and creativity across subjects, and help make our school more tech-ready coding gives students real, useful skills and better chances after graduation — tech jobs keep growing and learning to code even a little bit opens doors. Teaching kids to make a tiny app or website isn't just "fun projects," it's practicing how to break big problems into smaller steps, test ideas, and keep trying when something fails — skills employers really want. Lots of education groups and workforce data back this up: computer science in K–12 is linked to stronger problem-solving and higher engagement, and jobs in software and computing are among the faster-growing occupations, so offering Coding Basics now helps students get a head start. Plus, when students — especially those who haven't had access before — actually build things they care about, you see confidence and curiosity grow fast; that feeling sticks with them across classes and can change how they see school and themselves. adding Coding Basics is a step toward equity and measurable opportunity for our students. research published in education journals and national organizations shows that early, classroom-based computer science instruction improves computational thinking, problem-solving, and engagement—skills that transfer to math, science, and real-world tasks. the technology workforce is growing quickly (software and related computing jobs are among the fastest-growing occupations), so even a foundational coding course gives students clearer pathways to well-paying careers and postsecondary options that many families currently can’t access

Some folks might say we shouldn't add Coding Basics cuz of money, time, and staff — they’ll worry about buying devices, training teachers, squeezing another class into an already packed schedule, or that it's a fad and not everyone needs coding. But those objections don't outweigh the upside. The class can start small (elective, club, or rotating lab), use free tools like Scratch and web-based Python so hardware costs stay low, and teachers can get short PD or partner with local colleges/volunteers instead of hiring lots of new staff. Coding actually boosts skills used in math and science, so it can reinforce core subjects instead of stealing time. And rather than widen gaps, offering this in school gives all kids access they might not have at home — that’s real equity. So the practical, low-cost rollout options plus the long-term gains in problem-solving, engagement, and career pathways make adding Coding Basics worth it despite the concerns.