Asked by caleb
The Industrial Revolution, which had changed western Europe quickly and dramatically, had not brought the same advances in Russia at the start ofthe 20th century. How did the lack of industry help cause a series of revolutions in Russia?
In Russia's agriculture-based economy, there were few possibilities for making money or moving up in society.
Without railroad or communication systems, Russia was not prepared to protect its vast territory from those who wanted to control it.
Without the ideas that came out of the Industrial Revolution, Russia did not know how to compete for new colonies.
Without the experience of an Industrial Revolution, Russians did not understand that revolutions inteferred with commerce.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Correct answers: 1 and 2.
- 1 is correct. Because Russia remained overwhelmingly agrarian, peasants and many urban workers had few opportunities for advancement or better wages. Widespread poverty, land hunger, and lack of social mobility created deep social grievances that fueled strikes, peasant unrest, and ultimately revolutionary movements.
- 2 is correct. Limited rail and communications and an underdeveloped industrial base weakened Russia’s military logistics and ability to respond to crises (as shown in the Russo-Japanese War and later in World War I). Military defeats and the state’s inability to protect territory and maintain order undermined confidence in the tsarist regime and helped trigger revolutions.
- 3 is not a good explanation of the revolutions. Competition for colonies was more a matter of foreign policy and imperial ambition; while industrial weakness limited Russia’s global power, the immediate causes of revolution were domestic socioeconomic and political failures, not chiefly an inability to acquire colonies.
- 4 is incorrect. Lack of industrial experience didn’t make Russians unaware that revolutions disrupt commerce; revolutions occurred because of social, economic, and political grievances, not because people didn’t understand the economic consequences.
- 1 is correct. Because Russia remained overwhelmingly agrarian, peasants and many urban workers had few opportunities for advancement or better wages. Widespread poverty, land hunger, and lack of social mobility created deep social grievances that fueled strikes, peasant unrest, and ultimately revolutionary movements.
- 2 is correct. Limited rail and communications and an underdeveloped industrial base weakened Russia’s military logistics and ability to respond to crises (as shown in the Russo-Japanese War and later in World War I). Military defeats and the state’s inability to protect territory and maintain order undermined confidence in the tsarist regime and helped trigger revolutions.
- 3 is not a good explanation of the revolutions. Competition for colonies was more a matter of foreign policy and imperial ambition; while industrial weakness limited Russia’s global power, the immediate causes of revolution were domestic socioeconomic and political failures, not chiefly an inability to acquire colonies.
- 4 is incorrect. Lack of industrial experience didn’t make Russians unaware that revolutions disrupt commerce; revolutions occurred because of social, economic, and political grievances, not because people didn’t understand the economic consequences.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.