Asked by banana
Which was a provision of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Scott v. Sandford case?
Enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.
Free African Americans could enjoy the same rights as other US citizens.
Slaveholders could only take enslaved workers into slave states or territories.
The Missouri Compromise was constitutional and should be upheld.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
"Enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit."
The Court held that people of African descent were not U.S. citizens and thus could not sue in federal court, and it declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
The Court held that people of African descent were not U.S. citizens and thus could not sue in federal court, and it declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.