Asked by Gabriel
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?
A separate bill of rights might be used later to weaken America’s reputation.
A separate bill of rights be might used later to free enslaved people.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution was not taking away any rights from citizens.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
Federalists argued the Constitution only granted enumerated powers to the national government, so a bill of rights wasn’t needed and might even be harmful by implying any unlisted rights weren’t protected.
Federalists argued the Constitution only granted enumerated powers to the national government, so a bill of rights wasn’t needed and might even be harmful by implying any unlisted rights weren’t protected.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.