Asked by Name
A popular video game developer has grown a reputation for releasing major video games that have a long list of bugs. In the latest release, one case includes a character opening a car door and the car door is ripped off and slung across the map. Another bug occurs when walking through some thresholds of the game. The player will fall through the floor of the map and keep falling to eternity. Many YouTubers have created clips from their streams and posted compilation videos of the bugs in action, as a humorous gesture. Which of the following audits might be most appropriate for addressing the developer's reputation and ensure the stability of future video game releases?(1 point)
Responses
This developer should conduct a tax audit to ensure they are paying their fair share in taxes and not leaving money on the table.
This developer should conduct a tax audit to ensure they are paying their fair share in taxes and not leaving money on the table.
This developer should conduct a system audit of their system for tracking and resolving code issues that lead to graphical, physical, and procedural bugs in video games.
This developer should conduct a system audit of their system for tracking and resolving code issues that lead to graphical, physical, and procedural bugs in video games.
This developer should conduct a product audit to be sure a game is ready for release.
This developer should conduct a product audit to be sure a game is ready for release.
This developer should conduct a process audit to examine if their procedures measure up to company standards.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
This developer should conduct a process audit to examine if their procedures measure up to company standards.
Reason: a process audit will evaluate the studio’s development, QA, testing, bug‑triage and release procedures (including test coverage, automated testing/CI, criteria for shipping, and post‑release patch workflows) so systemic issues that produce widespread bugs are found and fixed. (A product audit or a targeted system audit of the bug‑tracking/resolution system could be useful as follow‑ups, but the process audit is the most appropriate first step for improving long‑term stability and reputation.)
Reason: a process audit will evaluate the studio’s development, QA, testing, bug‑triage and release procedures (including test coverage, automated testing/CI, criteria for shipping, and post‑release patch workflows) so systemic issues that produce widespread bugs are found and fixed. (A product audit or a targeted system audit of the bug‑tracking/resolution system could be useful as follow‑ups, but the process audit is the most appropriate first step for improving long‑term stability and reputation.)
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.