Question

shortly answer thisGIVE AN EXAMPLE OF THIS Are the needs of people ever more important than the needs of animals and the planet?

Think about both sides of the argument. Then, pick either side (i.e., needs of people or needs of animals and the planet), and pre-write an argumentative essay supporting either side.

When pre-writing, identify information from identify relevant supporting evidence from the texts in this module, and plan how you will structure it in your argumentative essay.

You can use this graphic organizer as a structural guide: Graphic organizer containing four rectangular boxes in a vertical stack, each labeled with a number. The first box is labeled with a cloud icon and contains the word Topic. The second box is labeled with a digital play icon and contains the words Introduction and Claims. The third box is labeled with a pen icon and contains the text, Body: Reasons, Supporting Evidence, Counterargument. The fourth box is labeled with a gavel icon and contains the word Conclusion.
0 seconds ago

Answer 1

Briefly — both sides:
- For people: Human survival, health, and livelihoods can sometimes require prioritizing people (disaster relief, food security, jobs).
- For animals/planet: Long-term human well‑being depends on healthy ecosystems; protecting animals and the planet can prevent worse human harms later.

I pick: the needs of animals and the planet — because protecting ecosystems secures long‑term human survival and health.

Pre‑write (graphic‑organizer style)

1. Topic
- Are the needs of people ever more important than the needs of animals and the planet?
- Position: Prioritize animals and the planet to protect long‑term human welfare.

2. Introduction and Claim
- Hook: Example/stat — (insert module stat: e.g., species loss rate or climate projection).
- Context: Short note that urgent human needs sometimes conflict with conservation.
- Thesis (claim): Although short‑term human needs can justify specific exceptions, overall the needs of animals and the planet should take priority because ecosystem health underpins human survival, public health, and the economy.

3. Body: Reasons, Supporting Evidence, Counterargument
- Reason 1 — Ecosystem services sustain humans:
- Evidence: (insert module evidence: study/report showing ecosystem services value or food/water dependence).
- Explanation: Healthy ecosystems provide pollination, clean water, climate regulation — losing them threatens food and health.

- Reason 2 — Public health & disease prevention:
- Evidence: (insert module text: research linking habitat loss/animal trade to zoonotic disease emergence).
- Explanation: Protecting habitats and animals reduces disease risk and healthcare costs.

- Reason 3 — Long‑term economic stability:
- Evidence: (insert module case: economic losses from deforestation, fisheries collapse, or climate damages).
- Explanation: Short‑term exploitation yields short gains but large long‑term losses that harm people most vulnerable.

- Counterargument:
- Point: In emergencies (hunger, displacement), immediate human needs should come first.
- Rebuttal: Prioritize targeted, time‑limited human relief while designing solutions that restore and do not permanently damage ecosystems; policies can balance immediate aid with conservation (cite module example/policy if available).

4. Conclusion
- Restate thesis: Prioritizing animals and the planet is necessary for sustained human well‑being.
- Call to action: Recommend policies that integrate human relief with conservation (e.g., sustainable agriculture, ecosystem restoration, social safety nets).

Notes for plugging in module texts:
- Replace each "(insert module evidence…)" with specific citations from your module (title, author, key statistic/quote).
- Use one module text per reason and one for the counterargument/rebuttal to show you considered the readings.

If you want, I can convert this into a full short essay (with sample citations) once you paste the module texts or key facts.