Asked by halal
What is consideration?
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
In contract law, consideration is the “price” each party pays for the other’s promise — something of legal value exchanged so a promise becomes legally enforceable.
Core points (common-law approach)
- Definition: A promise is supported by consideration when the promisor receives a benefit or the promisee suffers a legal detriment as part of a bargain (Currie v Misa; Hamer v. Sidway).
- Bargained-for exchange: The promise must be given in return for the other party’s promise or act — the parties must have intended the exchange.
- Legal value: Consideration can be a benefit to the promisor or a detriment/forbearance by the promisee. Money, goods, services, refraining from a legal right, or assuming a legal obligation count.
- Sufficiency vs adequacy: Consideration must be legally sufficient (something of legal value) but courts generally will not inquire into its adequacy (parties can make bad bargains).
- Must move from the promisee: Traditionally the person suing must have provided the consideration (privity). Some modern rules and statutes relax this in certain cases.
- No past consideration: An act done before a promise is made is not valid consideration for that promise (past consideration rule).
- Pre-existing duty rule: Performing something one is already legally obliged to do is not good consideration for a new promise (but there are important exceptions and refinements — e.g., practical benefit in Williams v Roffey; UCC and Restatement variations for contract modifications).
Common substitutes and related doctrines
- Promissory estoppel: Where there is reliance on a promise and injustice will result from allowing the promisor to renege, a court may enforce the promise even without consideration.
- Nominal consideration: Parties sometimes recite a token payment to show consideration; courts may scrutinize this in some contexts but it can be sufficient to form a contract.
Short examples
- Valid consideration: A promises to pay B $1,000 if B paints A’s house. B paints the house (detriment) and A pays (benefit) — enforceable.
- No consideration (past): B repairs A’s car today; afterward A promises to pay $500 for the earlier repair — generally not enforceable because the repair was past consideration.
- Pre-existing duty: A police officer promises to arrest someone in exchange for $1,000 from a private citizen — unenforceable because the officer already had a legal duty to enforce the law.
Note: Civil-law jurisdictions use different concepts (cause, lawful cause) and handle enforceability differently. If you need jurisdiction-specific rules or case law, tell me which jurisdiction.
Core points (common-law approach)
- Definition: A promise is supported by consideration when the promisor receives a benefit or the promisee suffers a legal detriment as part of a bargain (Currie v Misa; Hamer v. Sidway).
- Bargained-for exchange: The promise must be given in return for the other party’s promise or act — the parties must have intended the exchange.
- Legal value: Consideration can be a benefit to the promisor or a detriment/forbearance by the promisee. Money, goods, services, refraining from a legal right, or assuming a legal obligation count.
- Sufficiency vs adequacy: Consideration must be legally sufficient (something of legal value) but courts generally will not inquire into its adequacy (parties can make bad bargains).
- Must move from the promisee: Traditionally the person suing must have provided the consideration (privity). Some modern rules and statutes relax this in certain cases.
- No past consideration: An act done before a promise is made is not valid consideration for that promise (past consideration rule).
- Pre-existing duty rule: Performing something one is already legally obliged to do is not good consideration for a new promise (but there are important exceptions and refinements — e.g., practical benefit in Williams v Roffey; UCC and Restatement variations for contract modifications).
Common substitutes and related doctrines
- Promissory estoppel: Where there is reliance on a promise and injustice will result from allowing the promisor to renege, a court may enforce the promise even without consideration.
- Nominal consideration: Parties sometimes recite a token payment to show consideration; courts may scrutinize this in some contexts but it can be sufficient to form a contract.
Short examples
- Valid consideration: A promises to pay B $1,000 if B paints A’s house. B paints the house (detriment) and A pays (benefit) — enforceable.
- No consideration (past): B repairs A’s car today; afterward A promises to pay $500 for the earlier repair — generally not enforceable because the repair was past consideration.
- Pre-existing duty: A police officer promises to arrest someone in exchange for $1,000 from a private citizen — unenforceable because the officer already had a legal duty to enforce the law.
Note: Civil-law jurisdictions use different concepts (cause, lawful cause) and handle enforceability differently. If you need jurisdiction-specific rules or case law, tell me which jurisdiction.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.