Question

Which details are important to include in a summary about how women in the 1890s excelled in bicycle racing, despite some disapproval? Check all that apply.

Women were strong competitors.
Men frequently watch other men compete, so it is not surprising that women attended cycling races.
Some people thought that it was “disgusting and degrading” for women cyclists to compete.
Women worked to break each other’s records in cycling.
A New York Times reporter attended and reported on Jane Yatman’s performance.
Irene Brush rode 200 miles in 22 hours.

Answer 1

Select these items:
- Women were strong competitors. — Shows they excelled.
- Some people thought that it was “disgusting and degrading” for women cyclists to compete. — Shows the disapproval they faced.
- Women worked to break each other’s records in cycling. — Shows their competitive drive and achievement.
- Irene Brush rode 200 miles in 22 hours. — A concrete example of their exceptional performance.

Do not select:
- Men frequently watch other men compete, so it is not surprising that women attended cycling races. — Irrelevant to how women excelled despite disapproval.
- A New York Times reporter attended and reported on Jane Yatman’s performance. — Possible supporting detail but not essential to the main point about women’s excellence despite criticism.