Asked by MAviS
In the case of Roe v. Wade, what explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?
A. The case involved a conflict between state and federal law.
B. The case raised significant constitutional questions regarding privacy rights.
C. The case was related to national security concerns.
D. The case involved an interstate dispute.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
B. The case raised significant constitutional questions regarding privacy rights. Roe challenged a Texas law as violating the Constitution (the right to privacy/due process), which warranted Supreme Court review.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.