Question

Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did? (1 p
• Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
• Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
• Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call.

Answer 1

"Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent."

The Supreme Court held that because police obtained a confession after custodial interrogation without informing Miranda of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination (and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel), the confession was inadmissible — hence the requirement of Miranda warnings.