Question

How has one specific Supreme Court ruling expanded freedom of speech by limiting a public official's ability to press for libel? (1 poini
Vear v. Minnesota determined that libel is allowed if it serves the interest of the public.
New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue charges of libel in the case of a public official.
New York Times v. United States determined that libel is allowed in certain instances.
Adams v. Jefferson determined that pursuing charges of libel is unconstitutional.

Answer 1

New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue charges of libel in the case of a public official. This ruling requires public officials to show statements were made with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, expanding free speech protections.