Asked by christian
We think that, by using its public school system to encourage recitation of the Regents' prayer, the State of New York has adopted a practice wholly inconsistent with the Establishment Clause. There can, of course, be no doubt that New York's program of daily classroom invocation of God's blessings as prescribed in the Regents' prayer is a religious activity.
–Supreme Court Opinion,
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
According to this passage, the main reason the Supreme Court ruled the prayer unconstitutional was because
time was taken away to recite the prayer.
the state was promoting religious activity.
religion was against the law in New York.
the prayer promoted Catholicism.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
the state was promoting religious activity.
Explanation: The Court struck it down because the public school (a state institution) was endorsing/encouraging religious exercise, violating the Establishment Clause—not because of time, a law banning religion, or favoritism toward Catholicism.
Explanation: The Court struck it down because the public school (a state institution) was endorsing/encouraging religious exercise, violating the Establishment Clause—not because of time, a law banning religion, or favoritism toward Catholicism.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.