Asked by unknown
Use the sentence to answer the question.
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling, it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.
Which proposed edit correctly addresses the comma splice in the original sentence?
(1 point)
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling: it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling; it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling (it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables).
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling, but it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
The argument against constructing a new highway is compelling; it will disrupt local ecosystems and water tables.
Explanation: Replacing the comma with a semicolon correctly joins the two independent clauses without changing the original meaning.
Explanation: Replacing the comma with a semicolon correctly joins the two independent clauses without changing the original meaning.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.