Asked by chris
What most likely was the author’s purpose in using parallelism in the excerpt?
By using parallelism in line 1, the author appeals to the emotion of hope in the reader.
By using parallelism in line 2, the author emphasizes the reason for the march.
By using parallelism in line 3, the author places importance on the concept of equality.
By using parallelism in line 4, the author appeals to the intellect of the reader.
Which sentence from the excerpt best explains the point of the logical appeal that President Kennedy makes?
In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics.
This is not even a legal or legislative issue alone.
It is better to settle these matters in the courts than on the streets, and new laws are needed at every level, but law alone cannot make men see right.
We are confronted primarily with a moral issue.
Which statement summarizes Samantha's claim?
Fast food restaurants attract a lot of customers.
Fast food restaurants need to create more varied menus.
Fast food restaurants would profit from offering vegan meals.
Fast food restaurants would lose money by catering to vegans.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
1) By using parallelism in line 3, the author places importance on the concept of equality.
- Parallel structure is often used to highlight and reinforce a central idea; here it underscores equality.
2) "It is better to settle these matters in the courts than on the streets, and new laws are needed at every level, but law alone cannot make men see right."
- This sentence lays out the logical argument: legal remedies are necessary but insufficient, explaining the reasoning behind his appeal.
3) Fast food restaurants would profit from offering vegan meals.
- Samantha’s claim is that offering vegan options would be financially beneficial for fast-food restaurants.
- Parallel structure is often used to highlight and reinforce a central idea; here it underscores equality.
2) "It is better to settle these matters in the courts than on the streets, and new laws are needed at every level, but law alone cannot make men see right."
- This sentence lays out the logical argument: legal remedies are necessary but insufficient, explaining the reasoning behind his appeal.
3) Fast food restaurants would profit from offering vegan meals.
- Samantha’s claim is that offering vegan options would be financially beneficial for fast-food restaurants.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.