Question

Can I have the argument of Enthography on anthropology 3rd year Collin.S.G During tonight M,favorite,P.Harper k,kenner,A and O Donnell 2017 page 102 and 188-207

Answer 1

I’m not sure which exact book/chapters you mean — the author list and citation look a bit mixed up. Can you confirm the exact title, editor(s) and/or ISBN (for example: “Anthropology 3rd year, Collins S.G., During M., Harper P., Kenner A., O’Donnell 2017”), or upload or paste the text from pages 102 and 188–207? Once I have the precise source or the page text I can give a focused summary of the authors’ argument.

In the meantime, here’s a concise, ready-to-use approach and a short general summary of the kinds of arguments about ethnography you’re likely to find in a contemporary 3rd‑year anthropology text (so you can match it against the pages you have):

What to look for on the pages
- The thesis/central claim: one sentence that states what the author argues about ethnography (e.g., “ethnography is not just data collection but a form of cultural production/reflexive representation”).
- Methods and evidence: description of participant observation, interviews, fieldnotes, archival work, or multisited fieldwork used to support the claim.
- Theoretical framing: reference to major themes (e.g., reflexivity, positionality, power/representation, writing culture, ethics).
- Examples/case studies: empirical material that illustrates how the methods produce particular insights or problems.
- Limitations and implications: acknowledged problems (bias, access, ethics) and what the argument implies for practice or theory.

Typical central arguments about ethnography in contemporary anthropology
- Ethnography is both method and text: It’s argued as an embodied method (participant observation, long-term immersion) and as a written, interpretive product. The process and the produced “ethnography” shape one another.
- Reflexivity and positionality matter: Ethnographers must reflect on their own positionality, power, and impact in the field; reflexive writing is required to make the work credible and ethical.
- Representation is political: Ethnographic texts don’t neutrally mirror cultures; they construct representations that can include, exclude, or reframe people’s lives. Authors often argue for attention to voice, consent, and consequences.
- Ethics and accountability: Contemporary accounts emphasize ethical obligations to interlocutors, ongoing consent, and the potential harms of publication.
- Methods are plural and evolving: From single-site participant observation to multi-sited ethnography, digital/virtual methods, and collaborative/co-produced ethnographies — the field has diversified.
- Literature and theory integration: Ethnography is used to test, extend, or complicate anthropological theories (e.g., kinship, exchange, identity, globalization) — the ethnographer’s analytical moves are key to the argument.
- Writing and style as analysis: Choices in narrative voice, structure, and inclusion of interlocutor words are part of the argument; some authors push experimental forms to better convey context.

How to write a short “argument summary” for coursework
1. One-sentence thesis: identify the author’s main claim about ethnography.
2. Key methods/evidence: 2–3 bullets on how they support it.
3. Theoretical frame: name the main concepts/theorists used.
4. Strengths/limits: 1–2 lines evaluating the argument’s persuasive power.
5. Implications: 1–2 lines on what this means for ethnographic practice.

If you can confirm the exact book or paste/upload the two page ranges (p.102 and pp.188–207), I’ll produce a precise, page‑by‑page summary and a short critique suitable for your 3rd‑year assignment.