Asked by xen
After Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, many judges initially ruled against the new law in cases involving trusts. Which statement best explains the reason many judges disagreed with the Antitrust Act?
(1 point)
Responses
Trusts were able to sell their goods at lower prices to consumers.
Trusts were able to sell their goods at lower prices to consumers.
Trusts were private property that the government should not control.
Trusts were private property that the government should not control.
Competition between businesses was still sufficient to benefit consumers.
Competition between businesses was still sufficient to benefit consumers.
Labor unions were damaging the free trade associated with trusts.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Trusts were private property that the government should not control.
Many judges, favoring laissez-faire principles and property/contract rights, saw the Sherman Act as an improper government intrusion on private business and thus ruled against its application.
Many judges, favoring laissez-faire principles and property/contract rights, saw the Sherman Act as an improper government intrusion on private business and thus ruled against its application.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.