Asked by unknown
Reagan's Speech from the Brandenburg Gate
by Ronald Reagan
We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]
To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]
Behind me stands a wall that encircles the free sectors of this city, part of a vast system of barriers that divides the entire continent of Europe. From the Baltic, south, those barriers cut across Germany in a gash of barbed wire, concrete, dog runs, and guardtowers.
Every man is a Berliner, forced to look upon a scar.
President von Weizsacker has said: "The German question is open as long as the Brandenburg Gate is closed." Today I say: As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.
"Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos."
Where four decades ago there was rubble, today in West Berlin there is the greatest industrial output of any city in Germany—busy office blocks, fine homes and apartments, proud avenues, and the spreading lawns of park land.
In the 1950's, Khrushchev predicted: "We will bury you." But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind—too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor.
Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state?
Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!
Address from the Brandenburg Gate (Berlin Wall), Ronald Reagan, June 12, 1987
Use the speech by President Ronald Reagan to answer the question.
Which statement best explains the false dichotomy President Reagan uses in the
speech and evaluates how effectively it supports his argument that "Freedom leads to
prosperity"?
(1 point)
Reagan presents only two outcomes -freedom or chaos-while ignoring other political
O and economic factors, but this simplification is effective because it makes his message
clear and emotionally persuasive.
Reagan argues that all nations are either completely re opresse, wncr
weakens his argument because listeners can easilv
identify exceptions.
Reagan suggests that freedom and prosperity are unrelated, using the Berlin Wall only as
a nistorical examole rather than an argumentative strateav.
Reagan compares East and West Berlin using detailed statistics, which proves tha
prosperity is caused solely by geography rather than political systems.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Option 1.
Reagan frames the situation as a choice between freedom (prosperity) and chaos/poverty, omitting other political, economic, and historical factors that affect prosperity. That simplification is a false dichotomy, but it is rhetorically effective: it makes his message clear and emotionally persuasive even though it oversimplifies the causal relationships.
Reagan frames the situation as a choice between freedom (prosperity) and chaos/poverty, omitting other political, economic, and historical factors that affect prosperity. That simplification is a false dichotomy, but it is rhetorically effective: it makes his message clear and emotionally persuasive even though it oversimplifies the causal relationships.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.