Asked by 1
Select all that apply
What are some differences between evaluating excellent performers and evaluating poor
performers?
1. You should hint to excellent performers that they are underperforming so that they do not
become complacent.
2. The message for excellent performers should be generally positive.
3. You should be honest with excellent performers but "sugarcoat" the message to poor
performers.
4. Poor performers should be told that they must improve.
What are some differences between evaluating excellent performers and evaluating poor
performers?
1. You should hint to excellent performers that they are underperforming so that they do not
become complacent.
2. The message for excellent performers should be generally positive.
3. You should be honest with excellent performers but "sugarcoat" the message to poor
performers.
4. Poor performers should be told that they must improve.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
2 and 4
Explanation: Excellent performers should receive generally positive feedback (with honest, constructive guidance as needed). Poor performers need clear, direct messages that they must improve — you should not sugarcoat or give misleading hints.
Explanation: Excellent performers should receive generally positive feedback (with honest, constructive guidance as needed). Poor performers need clear, direct messages that they must improve — you should not sugarcoat or give misleading hints.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.