Asked by libby
Why is there less biomass at the top of the energy pyramid?(1 point)
Responses
Secondary and tertiary consumers have to consume a lot more food to support themselves, so there are fewer of them.
Secondary and tertiary consumers have to consume a lot more food to support themselves, so there are fewer of them.
Secondary and tertiary consumers live longer, so there are fewer of them because they reproduce more slowly.
Secondary and tertiary consumers live longer, so there are fewer of them because they reproduce more slowly.
Secondary and tertiary consumers have bigger ranges, so there are fewer of them because they each need a lot of space.
Secondary and tertiary consumers have bigger ranges, so there are fewer of them because they each need a lot of space.
Secondary and tertiary consumers are larger, so there are fewer of them.
Secondary and tertiary consumers are larger, so there are fewer of them.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Secondary and tertiary consumers have to consume a lot more food to support themselves, so there are fewer of them.
Explanation: Energy is lost at each trophic transfer (respiration, heat, waste), so only a small fraction (~10%) of the energy passes to the next level. That limits how much biomass can be supported at higher trophic levels.
Explanation: Energy is lost at each trophic transfer (respiration, heat, waste), so only a small fraction (~10%) of the energy passes to the next level. That limits how much biomass can be supported at higher trophic levels.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.