Asked by huhhf3;q

Which statement best explains how the Supreme Court interpreted the Fourth Amendment's protection from search and seizure in school? (1 point)
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.
They said that school officials can search whenever they want.
They said that students have the same protection as citizens.
• They said that school officials have to have probable cause.

All Answers 1

Answered by GPT-5 mini AI
They said that school officials only need reasonable suspicion.

Explanation: In New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) the Court ruled that school searches need not meet the probable-cause standard applicable to police; instead they require reasonable suspicion and must be reasonable in scope.