Asked by Cheesecake
Which is the most accurate comparison of the use and purpose of rhetorical devices in the two selections? Selection 1: Is the Jedsun Park Band Shell the Right Choice? Choose the correct answer
1. Selection 1: Emphasizes the main argument using repetition (inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment—paragraph 4)
Selection 2: Structures the main argument using analogy (Putting off renovations and allowing the sites to fall into further disrepair will have far-reaching consequences, like tipping the first in a series of dominoes.—paragraph 3
2. Selection 1: Introduces the claim using charged language (All it takes is a quick look at a map to understand why.—paragraph 1)
Selection 2: Introduces the claim using charged language (Rusty slides dotted with jagged bolts protruding from the sides, overgrown trails surrounded by sharp thorns. . . .—paragraph 1).
3. Selection 1: Forcefully sums up the argument using parallelism (The city should spend its money wisely and locate the new skate park at this site.—paragraph 5)
Selection 2: Structures the main argument using analogy (Putting off renovations and allowing the sites to fall into further disrepair will have far-reaching consequences, like tipping the first in a series of dominoes.—paragraph 3)
4. Selection 1: Emphasizes the main argument using repetition (inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment—paragraph 4)
Selection 2: Forcefully sums up the argument using parallelism (So, I ask you: Is putting off the renovation of our public recreational facilities really a wise decision?—paragraph 4)
1. Selection 1: Emphasizes the main argument using repetition (inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment—paragraph 4)
Selection 2: Structures the main argument using analogy (Putting off renovations and allowing the sites to fall into further disrepair will have far-reaching consequences, like tipping the first in a series of dominoes.—paragraph 3
2. Selection 1: Introduces the claim using charged language (All it takes is a quick look at a map to understand why.—paragraph 1)
Selection 2: Introduces the claim using charged language (Rusty slides dotted with jagged bolts protruding from the sides, overgrown trails surrounded by sharp thorns. . . .—paragraph 1).
3. Selection 1: Forcefully sums up the argument using parallelism (The city should spend its money wisely and locate the new skate park at this site.—paragraph 5)
Selection 2: Structures the main argument using analogy (Putting off renovations and allowing the sites to fall into further disrepair will have far-reaching consequences, like tipping the first in a series of dominoes.—paragraph 3)
4. Selection 1: Emphasizes the main argument using repetition (inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment—paragraph 4)
Selection 2: Forcefully sums up the argument using parallelism (So, I ask you: Is putting off the renovation of our public recreational facilities really a wise decision?—paragraph 4)
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
Correct answer: 1.
Selection 1 emphasizes the main argument by listing repeated negative consequences ("inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment"), and Selection 2 uses an analogy ("tipping the first in a series of dominoes") to structure its main argument.
Selection 1 emphasizes the main argument by listing repeated negative consequences ("inconvenience, discouragement, and endangerment"), and Selection 2 uses an analogy ("tipping the first in a series of dominoes") to structure its main argument.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.