Question

gument
to provide at least three pieces of evidence to support the argument

to put the least important piece of evidence first
to put the least important piece of evidence first

to present it in a way that makes sense

Answer 1

I can do that — do you have a specific topic or claim you want me to build the argument for? If not, here’s a clear template plus a short example that follows your instructions (at least three pieces of evidence, least important first, presented coherently).

Template (least important → most important)
1. State your claim clearly in one sentence.
2. Evidence #1 (least important): present the piece of evidence, explain how it supports the claim, and add a short transition to the next point.
3. Evidence #2 (moderately important): present the evidence, explain its relevance and strength, connect to the claim, and transition.
4. Evidence #3 (most important): present the strongest evidence, explain why it’s decisive, and show how it ties directly to the claim.
5. Brief rebuttal or caveat (optional): acknowledge a likely counterargument and respond.
6. Conclusion: restate the claim and summarize why the ordered evidence supports it.

Example argument (claim: “Allowing employees to work remotely at least part-time benefits companies”)

1. Claim: Allowing employees to work remotely part-time benefits companies.
2. Evidence #1 (least important): Employee satisfaction surveys show a small but consistent increase in morale when remote options are available. This supports the claim because happier employees are easier to retain; however, survey results can be subjective, so they’re the weakest evidence here. Transition: beyond morale, there are measurable operational effects.
3. Evidence #2 (moderately important): Companies that offer flexible work report lower voluntary turnover rates, which reduces hiring and training costs. Lower turnover has a direct financial benefit, strengthening the claim beyond self-reports. Transition: the most compelling support is productivity and measurable cost savings.
4. Evidence #3 (most important): Multiple studies comparing output metrics found that employees working remotely part-time maintain or increase productivity while reducing overhead (office space, utilities). These measurable gains in productivity and cost reduction provide the strongest, concrete support that remote options benefit the company.
5. Rebuttal/caveat: Some roles require on-site presence and some managers report coordination challenges; hybrid policies and clear communication protocols address these issues.
6. Conclusion: Taken together—improved morale, lower turnover, and measurable productivity and cost benefits—these points make a strong case that allowing part-time remote work benefits companies.

If you give me your specific claim and any evidence you already have, I’ll draft a tailored argument in this order.