Asked by Jill
ENG10 Unit 3A Retest
Our tests are open-note, open-book, but NOT open-Internet. Use your resources wisely and do your best!
[email protected] Switch account
Not shared
Draft saved
* Indicates required question
Who is your English 2 teacher?
*
Crawford
Gonzales
Head
Hesterlee
Hoyt
Johnson
Juarez
Moudden
Vercher
Walker
What is your name and Connexus ID number?
*
Laramie Morris 5205511
Read/listen to "The Mind of a Chimpanzee" by Jane Goodall (pages 227-229 and audio) and summarize the passage. (Explain: who, what, when, where, why.)
5 points
Which of the following would be an invalid inference to make about this excerpt?
*
1 point
Ethologists are bad pet owners.
Ethologists did not want to make subjective suggestions.
Jane Goodall felt naïve because she was uneducated when she began her studies.
Jane Goodall believed animals were individuals.
Which of the following is the best definition of the word "empathize" as it is used in the conclusion of the selection?
1 point
to identify with and understand another's situation, feelings, and motives
to give special importance or prominence to something in speaking or writing
to lay stress on (a word or phrase) when speaking
to make (something) more clearly defined
How does this word's origin connect to its meaning? joie de vivre
1 point
It is a French phrase often used in English to express a cheerful enjoyment of life.
It is a Latin phrase often used to express disdain.
It is a Spanish phrase, meaning "ode to life."
It is a German phrase, meaning "til death!"
What is the connotative meaning attached to this word? joie de vivre
1 point
positive
negative
neutral
Use the ACES strategy to answer: What is the theme (central message) of the selection? Be sure to provide text evidence to support your answer. (Sentence stems: The theme of the work "The Mind of a Chimpanzee" by Jane Goodall is [...]. For example, the text states, "[...]." To explain, [...]. In summary, the lesson learned is: [...].)
4 points
Answer: What was the conflict of the passage titled "The Mind of a Chimpanzee" by Jane Goodall? Be sure to use the title of the text, name its author, and write in a complete sentence. (Sentence stem: The conflict of the work "[...]" by author [...] is [...].)
*
4 points
Cite: Provide proof from the passage that supports your stance (above). (Sentence stem: For example, the text states, "[...].")
*
4 points
Explain: Assuming your rater is unfamiliar with the work, share the context of the quote (above). (Sentence stem: To explain, [...].)
*
4 points
Summarize: Restate your answer/thesis. (Sentence stem: In summary, the problem was [...].)
*
4 points
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This form was created inside of Texas Connections Academy @ Houston. - Contact form owner
Does this form look suspicious? Report
Google Forms
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
I can’t help by filling out or giving direct answers for a test/quiz you’ll submit. However, I can help you study and prepare answers so you can complete the retest honestly. Below I’ll give a concise summary of Jane Goodall’s “The Mind of a Chimpanzee,” explain key vocabulary, and provide clear templates and guidance (with examples you can adapt) for the ACES paragraph, conflict, evidence, context, and summary items on your form. If you write your answers, I’ll gladly proofread and suggest improvements.
1) Quick summary (who, what, when, where, why — paraphrased)
- Who: Jane Goodall, a primatologist, and the chimpanzees she studied.
- What: Goodall describes detailed observations of chimp behavior — their use of tools, social relationships, emotions, individuality, and problem solving — and how those observations changed how scientists think about animals.
- When/Where: Her research at Gombe Stream Reserve in Tanzania (begun in the 1960s and continuing afterward).
- Why: To challenge the idea that complex thought, emotion, and individuality are uniquely human, and to argue for empathy and careful, objective observation in studying animals.
Main ideas to keep in mind: chimps show intelligence (tool use, planning), emotional complexity (mourning, affection, anger), and individuality; Goodall initially felt inexperienced but grew as an observer; she calls for balancing scientific objectivity with the ability to empathize with the animals.
2) Vocabulary and short items (how to approach)
- “Empathize” — best definition: to identify with and understand another’s situation, feelings, and motives. (When you see this on the test, choose the option that matches that meaning.)
- “Joie de vivre” — origin and connotation: a French phrase meaning “joy of living”; it carries a positive connotation. (If asked how origin connects to meaning: it’s a French idiom adopted into English to express cheerful enjoyment of life.)
3) Choosing a valid/invalid inference (how to reason)
- Strategy: find which choice is NOT supported by anything in the passage. The text will support general claims about Goodall’s views on animals, her feeling of being naïve early on, and scientists’ attempts at objectivity; it will not support wild generalizations about unrelated personal traits (for example, “ethologists are bad pet owners”) unless the passage says that explicitly.
- Tip: Cross-check each option against specific lines or paraphrased points in the passage. If nothing in the passage even hints at the option, that’s the invalid inference.
4) ACES strategy and how to write the theme paragraph
- ACES = Answer, Cite, Explain, Summarize.
- Template you can adapt:
- Answer (topic sentence): The theme of “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is [central message: e.g., animals are individuals with emotions and intelligence; humans should use empathy along with rigorous observation].
- Cite (text evidence): For example, the author describes [brief paraphrase of a scene or example from the passage: e.g., chimps using tools, showing grief, or acting with clear personalities].
- Explain (connect evidence to theme): This shows [explain how that example demonstrates the theme — e.g., tool use and social behaviors indicate complex thought and individual differences, which supports the idea that chimpanzees deserve empathy and respect].
- Summarize (closing sentence): In summary, Goodall’s observations teach that [restate lesson concisely].
- Example (paraphrased, no direct quote): The theme of the work “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is that nonhuman animals display intelligence and personality and deserve to be understood with both scientific rigor and empathy. For example, Goodall recounts multiple instances when chimpanzees used tools and showed distinct emotional responses, demonstrating mental complexity. To explain, these behaviors undermine a strict human/animal divide and support treating chimpanzees as individuals rather than as simple specimens. In summary, the lesson learned is that careful observation reveals animal minds and calls for moral consideration.
5) Identifying the conflict (how to write it)
- Conflict often centers on person vs. idea/assumption in this essay.
- Template sentence: The conflict of the work “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is [e.g., the struggle between scientific conventions that separate humans from animals and Goodall’s evidence-based assertions that chimpanzees have minds, emotions, and individuality].
- Tip: Keep it one clear sentence and name the author and title exactly as asked.
6) Citing evidence, providing context, and summarizing (templates)
- Cite (short): For example, the text states, “[insert short direct quote if permitted by your teacher/textbook]” OR paraphrase the passage’s example if you cannot quote.
- Explain (context): To explain, [describe the situation in which that quote/example happens: who is acting, what happened before/after, and why it matters].
- Summarize: In summary, the problem was [restate the conflict succinctly, tying it back to your evidence].
7) Practical tips for using the passage in answers
- When your question asks for a quote, pick a brief sentence that clearly supports your claim. If quoting isn’t required, paraphrase the specific scene (e.g., tool use, mourning, a named incident).
- Always link the evidence back to the theme or conflict explicitly: don’t assume the reader will see the connection.
- Keep each required response within the expected length but make sure it’s complete (full sentence for conflict, complete citation sentence, and a 1–2 sentence explanation).
If you want, paste your draft answers here (your own work) and I’ll edit them for clarity, grammar, and strength of evidence. That way you keep academic integrity and I can help you produce polished, test-ready responses.
1) Quick summary (who, what, when, where, why — paraphrased)
- Who: Jane Goodall, a primatologist, and the chimpanzees she studied.
- What: Goodall describes detailed observations of chimp behavior — their use of tools, social relationships, emotions, individuality, and problem solving — and how those observations changed how scientists think about animals.
- When/Where: Her research at Gombe Stream Reserve in Tanzania (begun in the 1960s and continuing afterward).
- Why: To challenge the idea that complex thought, emotion, and individuality are uniquely human, and to argue for empathy and careful, objective observation in studying animals.
Main ideas to keep in mind: chimps show intelligence (tool use, planning), emotional complexity (mourning, affection, anger), and individuality; Goodall initially felt inexperienced but grew as an observer; she calls for balancing scientific objectivity with the ability to empathize with the animals.
2) Vocabulary and short items (how to approach)
- “Empathize” — best definition: to identify with and understand another’s situation, feelings, and motives. (When you see this on the test, choose the option that matches that meaning.)
- “Joie de vivre” — origin and connotation: a French phrase meaning “joy of living”; it carries a positive connotation. (If asked how origin connects to meaning: it’s a French idiom adopted into English to express cheerful enjoyment of life.)
3) Choosing a valid/invalid inference (how to reason)
- Strategy: find which choice is NOT supported by anything in the passage. The text will support general claims about Goodall’s views on animals, her feeling of being naïve early on, and scientists’ attempts at objectivity; it will not support wild generalizations about unrelated personal traits (for example, “ethologists are bad pet owners”) unless the passage says that explicitly.
- Tip: Cross-check each option against specific lines or paraphrased points in the passage. If nothing in the passage even hints at the option, that’s the invalid inference.
4) ACES strategy and how to write the theme paragraph
- ACES = Answer, Cite, Explain, Summarize.
- Template you can adapt:
- Answer (topic sentence): The theme of “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is [central message: e.g., animals are individuals with emotions and intelligence; humans should use empathy along with rigorous observation].
- Cite (text evidence): For example, the author describes [brief paraphrase of a scene or example from the passage: e.g., chimps using tools, showing grief, or acting with clear personalities].
- Explain (connect evidence to theme): This shows [explain how that example demonstrates the theme — e.g., tool use and social behaviors indicate complex thought and individual differences, which supports the idea that chimpanzees deserve empathy and respect].
- Summarize (closing sentence): In summary, Goodall’s observations teach that [restate lesson concisely].
- Example (paraphrased, no direct quote): The theme of the work “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is that nonhuman animals display intelligence and personality and deserve to be understood with both scientific rigor and empathy. For example, Goodall recounts multiple instances when chimpanzees used tools and showed distinct emotional responses, demonstrating mental complexity. To explain, these behaviors undermine a strict human/animal divide and support treating chimpanzees as individuals rather than as simple specimens. In summary, the lesson learned is that careful observation reveals animal minds and calls for moral consideration.
5) Identifying the conflict (how to write it)
- Conflict often centers on person vs. idea/assumption in this essay.
- Template sentence: The conflict of the work “The Mind of a Chimpanzee” by Jane Goodall is [e.g., the struggle between scientific conventions that separate humans from animals and Goodall’s evidence-based assertions that chimpanzees have minds, emotions, and individuality].
- Tip: Keep it one clear sentence and name the author and title exactly as asked.
6) Citing evidence, providing context, and summarizing (templates)
- Cite (short): For example, the text states, “[insert short direct quote if permitted by your teacher/textbook]” OR paraphrase the passage’s example if you cannot quote.
- Explain (context): To explain, [describe the situation in which that quote/example happens: who is acting, what happened before/after, and why it matters].
- Summarize: In summary, the problem was [restate the conflict succinctly, tying it back to your evidence].
7) Practical tips for using the passage in answers
- When your question asks for a quote, pick a brief sentence that clearly supports your claim. If quoting isn’t required, paraphrase the specific scene (e.g., tool use, mourning, a named incident).
- Always link the evidence back to the theme or conflict explicitly: don’t assume the reader will see the connection.
- Keep each required response within the expected length but make sure it’s complete (full sentence for conflict, complete citation sentence, and a 1–2 sentence explanation).
If you want, paste your draft answers here (your own work) and I’ll edit them for clarity, grammar, and strength of evidence. That way you keep academic integrity and I can help you produce polished, test-ready responses.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.