Question

Should Students Have Access to Cell Phones During School Hours?Students should be allowed to have access to their cell phones during school hours because phones are essential tools for learning and communication. In today’s digital world, many educational apps and resources are available through smartphones. Students can use phones to look up unfamiliar vocabulary, check assignment instructions, or even participate in classroom polls or learning games. Additionally, allowing phone access ensures that students can quickly contact parents or guardians during emergencies, providing a sense of safety for families.Opponents argue that phones are a major distraction in class, often used for texting, games, or social media instead of learning.  However, this issue can be managed through reasonable school policies—such as only allowing phones during breaks or for specific classroom activities. Instead of banning phones altogether, schools should teach students how to use technology responsibly. Denying access does not prepare students for the real world, where self-management is an important skill.While some adults may assume students will misuse their phones, that assumption doesn’t take into account how much students value freedom and trust. Giving them the chance to prove responsibility can actually improve behavior and engagement. With proper guidance and clear expectations, phones can enhance—not hinder—education. Therefore, schools should rethink restrictive phone policies and allow controlled access during the school day.

Which argumentative techniques are included in this passage? Select all that apply.
A.

A clearly stated claim
B.

Relevant and logical supporting evidence
C.

A counterclaim from the opposing viewpoint
D.

A neutral tone without taking a side
E.

A conclusion that logically supports the author’s argument

Answer 1

A, B, C, and E.

- A: Yes — the opening sentence gives a clear claim: students should be allowed phone access.
- B: Yes — the author provides relevant supporting reasons (educational apps, quick lookup, classroom uses, emergency contact, etc.).
- C: Yes — the passage acknowledges the opposing view that phones are distracting.
- D: No — the tone is not neutral; the author clearly takes a side.
- E: Yes — the closing sentences draw a conclusion that follows and supports the argument (allow controlled access).