Asked by nana
Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
On which fact do the two sources disagree?
(1 point)
Responses
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Source 1 assumes district-wide participation is necessary and feasible; Source 2 says getting all students to follow a program is not easy and can make programs ineffective.
Source 1 assumes district-wide participation is necessary and feasible; Source 2 says getting all students to follow a program is not easy and can make programs ineffective.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.