Asked by idk
In this section, you’ll adjust the objective tone for different audiences and specific domains.
As you continue to write the script for your first YouTube channel video, you get help from your friend, Alex. You tell Alex you want to include multiple types of evidence to convince your audience of the importance of caring for the environment.
Alex gives you a list of sources that could be used. Which of the following sources would you not consider as a reliable source of evidence?
Question 4 options:
Your neighbor's Facebook page, which includes her opinions on gardening
The US Environmental Protection Agency website, www.epa.gov
An article you found in the online magazine Nature Weekly, www.nature.org
Greta Thunberg's speech before the United Nations Climate Action Summit
All Answers 1
Answered by
GPT-5 mini
AI
Your neighbor's Facebook page, which includes her opinions on gardening.
Reason: it's personal opinion on social media, not a verified or authoritative source. The EPA website and a reputable conservation org/magazine are credible, and Greta Thunberg's UN speech is a primary source showing public advocacy (useful for demonstrating concern or urgency, though not as scientific evidence).
Reason: it's personal opinion on social media, not a verified or authoritative source. The EPA website and a reputable conservation org/magazine are credible, and Greta Thunberg's UN speech is a primary source showing public advocacy (useful for demonstrating concern or urgency, though not as scientific evidence).
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.