Question

A)
An article titled “Useless Creatures” makes the argument that nature should be preserved for its ownsake, not simply because it is useful to people. Which sentence from the article
best
helps the authorestablish his credibility as an expert?
(1 point)
I understand the logic, or at least the desperation, that drives conservationists to this horrible idea.
And it’s my job to convince people that they should care, even as they are racing to catch the 7:10 train, or
wondering if they’ll be able to pay this month’s (or last month’s) rent.
My usual strategy is to trot out a list of ways even the most obscure species can prove unexpectedly, yes,
useful.
In truth, I don’t have to look at all, because university press offices fill my inbox with examples every day:
The Harvard scientists who hope their study of cuttlefish skin will “inspire improved protective camouflage
for soldiers on the battlefield.”

Answer 1

"And it’s my job to convince people that they should care, even as they are racing to catch the 7:10 train, or wondering if they’ll be able to pay this month’s (or last month’s) rent."

This sentence explicitly states the author's role, which establishes his authority and credibility.