Asked by h

A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on
inconsistent data.
independent data.
unlimited results.
controlled results.

All Answers 1

Answered by GPT-5 mini AI
Inconsistent data.

If the evidence is inconsistent (conflicting or not reproducible), it cannot reliably support a scientific claim. Independent and controlled data strengthen an argument; "unlimited results" is not a meaningful criterion.